Alexander C. Kaufman
December 20, 2018
Huffington PostInstead, Democrats are sticking to their original plan, and channeled Exxon Mobil in an announcement refusing to bar members who take fossil fuel money.
Democratic leaders on Thursday tapped Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.) to head a revived U.S. House panel on climate change, all but ending a dramatic monthlong effort to establish a select committee on a Green New Deal.
Castor's appointment came as a surprise to proponents of a Green New Deal. The move also kicked off a controversy as the six-term congresswoman dismissed calls to bar members who accept money from fossil fuel companies from serving on the committee, arguing it would violate free speech rights.
Despite weeks of protests demanding House Democrats focus efforts next year on drafting a Green New Deal, the sort of sweeping economic policy that scientists say matches the scale of the climate crisis, Castor told E&E News the plan was "not going to be our sole focus."
She then suggested that barring members who have accepted donations from the oil, gas and coal industries from serving on the committee could be unconstitutional.
"I don't think you can do that under the First Amendment, really," she said.
That reasoning echoed arguments Exxon Mobil Corp. made in court as recently as this year to defend its funding of right-wing think tanks that deliberately produced misinformation about climate science to stymie government action on global warming.
Soon after the remarks were published, Castor walked back the statement in an interview with HuffPost, calling it an "inartful answer."
But she said she did not know whether, as chairperson, she could bar members on the committee from serving if they accepted fossil fuel donations.
"Maybe that's a discussion we need to have in the caucus," Castor said.
It's a stunning upset, essentially returning Democrats to the original plan leaders laid out before the protests began in November. The announcement comes as a loss for Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). Her meteoric rise and devoted base made it seem as if she were poised to win the burgeoning cadre of leftist Democrats a beachhead in a select committee that, even with limited capacity, would have demonstrated tangible power in Washington.
But, if it's defeat, it's bittersweet. The campaign, seemingly quixotic at first, shifted the stagnant climate policy debate not just to the left but, for the first time, in the direction of policies that could make a dent in surging global emissions and curb soaring income inequality. Coupled with back-to-back United Nations and federal reports that showed climate change already rapidly worsening, the effort established a new litmus test for lawmakers, breaking the binary of whether or not a politicians "believes" in the science of human-caused warming.
The movement gained stunning support in just a few weeks. A poll released Monday found 81 percent of registered voters supported the policies outlined under the Green New Deal resolution ― including 64 percent of Republicans and 57 percent of self-described conservative Republicans. Last Friday, more than 300 state and local officials voiced support for a Green New Deal in an open letter.
"We don't have time to sit on our hands as our planet burns," Ocasio-Cortez said Thursday in a tweet. "For young people, climate change is bigger than election or re-election. It's life or death."
It's unclear whether Ocasio-Cortez will even get a seat on the select committee.
Asked if she accepted money from fossil fuel companies, Castor said, "I cannot think of a contribution from an oil company or fossil fuel company, but I cannot say without going back and with a fine-toothed comb that there wasn't something in the past."
According to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, Castor accepted more than $73,000 from the energy and natural resources sector over her 12-year tenure in Congress, including $60,000 from corporate political action committees. The League of Conservation Voters gave Castor an 86 percent score last year on its ranking, which is based on her voting record. She had a 93 percent lifetime score.
She said she would consider taking the No Fossil Fuel Money pledge, a vow overseen by a handful of progressive groups including proponents of a Green New Deal. Asked what the decision hinged on, Castor said, "I don't know."
"We're at year-end with a possible shutdown and I think the important thing is looking at folks for the committee who are ready to serve," she said.
The restoration of the select committee on climate change puts an end to a month-long effort to replace it with a panel focused specifically on crafting a Green New Deal, an umbrella term for a suite of policies that would include shifting the United States to 100 percent renewable energy over the next decade and guaranteeing high-wage, federally backed jobs to workers in outmoded industries.
The proposal stormed into mainstream political debate over the past month after protesters from the progressive groups Sunrise Movement and Justice Democrats held sit-ins in Pelosi's office. The demonstrations came in response to what they saw as plans for a tepid response to the climate crisis when the party takes control of the House next month.
Ocasio-Cortez, a left-wing firebrand with a powerful online following, joined the protests and proposed swapping Pelosi's plan to restore the climate select committee with a plan for a panel devoted to the Green New Deal.
For a few weeks, it seemed likely to happen. More than 40 incoming or sitting House Democrats pledged to support the resolution, and nearly half a dozen senators announced their support for the effort, including at least three likely 2020 presidential contenders.
But the proposal ruffled feathers in Washington. Incoming chairmen of committees that traditionally oversee energy and environmental policy complained that a Green New Deal select committee would strip them of legislative power. And Beltway veterans privately expressed frustration that a cadre of insurgent freshmen, some of whom toppled long-time allies in primaries, were using their grassroots popularity to call shots.Democratic leaders responded in kind, declining to contact activists or Ocasio-Cortez before announcing plans to ignore the resolution and restore the previous climate select committee instead.
Representatives from Sunrise Movement and Justice Democrats confirmed they were not told of the decision until they read about it on E&E News. Castor said she "chatted with Rep.-elect Ocasio-Cortez, but not specifically on this."
In a statement, Sunrise Movement said a select committee "that makes a plan for implementing a Green New Deal is an opportunity for Democrats in the House."
"Without a mandate to create a plan and a requirement that its members don't take fossil fuel money, we are deeply concerned that this committee will be just another of the many committees we've seen failing our generation our entire lives," Varshini Prakash, the Sunrise Movement's co-founder, said in a statement.
Later Thursday evening, Sunrise political director Evan Weber said the group would continue the fight.
"Nancy Pelosi has the power to determine whether or not the Select Committee for a Green New Deal lives or dies," Weber said. "Sunrise Movement's position is and will continue to be that it's not over until she makes it clear that it's over."
But, earlier this week, Democratic leaders announced that a Green New Deal select committee would lack subpoena power, seemingly sounding the death knell for the resolution.
Castor said the select committee she agreed to chair would likely have subpoena power, but not legislative power. She said she did not know yet which individuals or companies she would use that power to investigate.
"I honestly thought the Democratic Party leaders would see this opportunity," said Waleed Shahid, the communications director for Justice Democrats, a left-wing group championing the Green New Deal proposal. "It's infuriating to see a fellow Democrat basically parrot the talking points of the Koch Brothers when it comes to the very common-sense idea that any politician who accepts donations from the fossil-fuel corporations should not be allowed to legislate on climate change."
But Castor's appointment won praise from establishment environmental groups.
"Rep. Kathy Castor is an outstanding choice to help lead the House's renewed focus on climate change," John Bowman, senior director for federal affairs at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement. "As a longtime environmental champion, few are better suited to help shine a bright light on the threats Americans face from the climate crisis and advance the solutions we urgently need."
Alexander Kaufman is a climate and environment reporter at HuffPost, based in New York. Email him at email@example.com. Direct message him on Twitter @AlexCKaufman for his phone number on the encrypted messaging app Signal.
Interpret the world and change it
To unsubscribe, click here.
Wednesday, December 26, 2018
Re: Democrats Just Blocked Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Push for a Green New Deal Committee
I confess I don't put much weight on this critique, at least not now. Do I support a green new deal? Yes. But nothing will be accomplished without first deposing Trump, on any front. The coalition to remove Trump requires forces esp in Congress wider than supporters of the green New deal. The fascist forces we confront are prepared to rip up democracy and the Constitution before ANY expansion of public goods if any kindaybe yyt
Deed, the EPA, HEALTH CARE, JOBS, WAGES, be. My yyt
On Dec 21, 2018 11:00 PM, "Portside" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Posted by The Red Caboose at 8:29 AM