Thursday, June 16, 2016

Envisioning a modern, democratic, peaceful, and green socialism [feedly]

jcase:

I agree, mostly,  with John's short description.of socialism. And I am glad to be reminded that Marx affirmed his own vision of socialism as a direction, not a static condition. I  agree with John that  a truly great gift of the Sanders campaign is that it made it OK to label that direction: democratic socialism again.  And enter the public debate about DIRECTION in a serious, competitive, and constructive manner.

Some of the essential features of Marx's attributes of that DIRECTION, that remain relevant a century and a half later.:

  • the advance of public over private property -- a much more complex, and objective (not just policy) process than Marx described, but true.
  • inequalities in wealth, power, and rights, recede as the working class is elevated
  • internationalism is the path to peace.

Bernie had a reason for calling the JUST THE CHANGE IN DIRECTION on austerity, education, retirement, health care, and  inequality, ending private wealth abuses, etc. -- as "revolution" and "democratic socialism".  It was a warning: Just that SIMPLE CHANGE IN DIRECTION is beyond the power of ANY president, he warned. 

And, until that change in direction is WON, through mass  struggle, local and state governance is going to be the test of fire for any true working class champions:  an environment of sharp and unremitting struggles for survival that are shaping up to have a lot of sharp edges.  Who can lead will be proved there.

In the Vermont years when I knew Bernie, one thing stood out. He never spent much time debating the "left". To the irritation and disgruntlement of some activists in the progressive coalition that backed him, he used his position as Mayor to actually empower working class organizations, churches and social groups, and local businesses, in public administration and dialog. The Left, he found (or already knew) were ok at agitation, but often not much use in public admin. 

Life is hard on the streets. Calls to disarm, no matter how reasonable in the abstract, can backfire when no one trusts the marshall. The democratic socialist must be, or hire, the trusted marshall too. Tough job going down the road we are on.

john














Envisioning a modern, democratic, peaceful, and green socialism
http://peoplesworld.org/envisioning-a-modern-democratic-peaceful-and-green-socialism/


People's World Series on Socialism

Everyone seems to be talking about socialism these days, but what does it mean? That was the question asked by Susan Webb in one of our most popular and widely-shared recent articles. Millions of Americans are considering alternatives to a system run by and for the 1 percent. They are taking an interest in socialism, a word that has meant a great many things to activists, trade unionists, politicians, and clergy around the world over the last century and a half. The article below is one of a series on socialism, what it can mean for Americans in the 21st century, and how we might get there. Other articles in the series can be found here

(Socialism) is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call (socialism) the real movement, which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence.

-- Karl Marx, in The German Ideology

The historic presidential campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders has tapped the smoldering resentments of millions toward Wall Street domination of politics, extreme wealth inequality, widespread economic insecurity, and institutionalized racism and sexism. Sanders has also stimulated a wide-ranging discussion about what he calls "democratic socialism" and the need for a "people's revolution."

From the Cold War until now, the American people have been denied the right to discuss socialism in the public arena. But these discussions have now forced their way to the surface. The idea of socialism is something that must be thought of in ways different from the formulas we on the left may have relied upon in the past.

Era of transition

A revolutionary reorganization of society to one that is people-centered, democratic, peaceful, and in harmony with nature is necessary if humanity is to survive and flower. Some hold the view that social revolution will be precipitated by a general strike or an implosion of the economy. The old ruling class will be overthrown and the working class will hoist the red flag.

In my view, a socialist revolution is not an episodic event, nor is it inevitable. It is the product of a complex and contested process, a transition orchestrated by real people consciously and creatively shaping their conditions of existence to make their lives more livable, secure, enjoyable, and meaningful.

Its realization will span an era of multiple stages of radical systemic, economic, political, social, and cultural change that addresses urgent and concrete needs. And it will certainly be an ongoing process.  No one can predict exactly how this process will unfold or what the new society will ultimately look like. One thing is certain though - there are no blueprints for either. The process differs in each country depending on its unique set of circumstances, challenges, histories, and traditions.

Socialism in waves

So long as classes and class exploitation and oppression have existed, a struggle for freedom has been waged. Socialism is the modern expression of this age-old quest by humanity. I like to envision the historic realization of socialism as a series of epic waves, characterized by ebbs and flows, advances and defeats. It's a history of great achievements, but also mistakes, errors, misjudgments, setbacks, and even experiences that go counter to the moral and humanistic ethos of socialism.

The first wave featured utopian socialist communities, which during the 19th century numbered in the hundreds in the U.S. They were founded on religious and moral convictions in response to the dehumanizing effects of class society and religious persecution.

A second wave encompassed 20th century socialism, born during the stormy era of war and revolution beginning in 1917. Economic backwardness, militarization in response to foreign intervention, devastation from WWII, and the Cold War arms race, compounded by undeveloped democratic institutions, determined the trajectory of those societies.

They were characterized by centrally-planned economies and total state ownership of the means of production. Among the great achievements were rapid industrialization, elimination of illiteracy, universal health care and education. But there were also democratic shortcomings, including constitutionally-enshrined one-party rule, political repression, lack of an independent press, and dogmatic approaches to ideology. These flaws, though not the sole explanations, contributed to their failure.

A third wave is unfolding today in a totally new historical context: post-collapse of 20th century socialism, the deepening crisis of late capitalism, extreme wealth inequality, the displacement of millions of workers through automation, and an ecological crisis that threatens mankind's very survival.

Surviving socialist-oriented states, drawing on the lessons of the failure of the USSR and Eastern European socialist-oriented societies, abandoned the old models and adopted mixed economies and, in some cases, economic decentralization.

In other countries, particularly Central and South America, left coalitions that include socialists and communists have rejected armed struggle. Some have been elected to head up or as part of governing coalitions and are attempting to institute economic, social, and democratic reforms.

In Europe, mass socialist and left-led anti-austerity movements like Syriza, Podemos, and left united fronts are also contesting for power electorally. Socialists and the left comprise the majority in the British Labour Party now, as well as a substantial part of the Democratic Party.

Majorities make change

Majorities make lasting change. People gain a deeper consciousness, including socialist consciousness, in the course of greater participation in the struggle for immediate and longer-term radical economic, political, and social change.

The contours and features of a democratic eco-socialist society are and will be determined by the American people, with the diverse multi-racial working class at the core. Its daily struggle, including at the center of a future governing coalition, will be the dominant force shaping every aspect of politics, culture, and life.

The American people can draw on a rich history of struggle that has expanded democratic horizons and helped shape our thinking on the values of a future society. That history includes the American War for Independence and the Bill of Rights; the defeat of slavery; the Civil Rights Movement and struggles for racial equality; movements for labor, suffragette, and women's equality; free speech; LGTBQIA equality; disability rights; immigrant rights; and climate justice movements.

It is being shaped today in the fight against right-wing extremism and its domination of the government at all levels and the judiciary, along with its ideology of hate in the 2016 elections. The organizations, movements and activists making up the broad and diverse anti-extreme right coalition will be at the center of an even broader and more diverse future coalition of socialist forces.

Democracy equals socialism

The revolutionary process unleashes the creative energy of millions through a wide variety of forms of mass protest, including mass non-violent action, in the battle for ideas and in the cultural sphere.

These forms of action are dialectically connected with voting and mobilization in the election arena, which will be greatly democratized as millions more become engaged. This includes repealing and removing voter suppression laws, Citizen's United, and the introduction of proportional representation.

It must result in the election of labor-led coalitions and ordinary working people to office at every level. The breadth and depth of these coalitions and their degree of political consciousness will determine the extent of their ability to institute reforms that not only curb the power of the capitalist class but simultaneously put the country on a socialist-oriented path, the eventual disappearance of classes and the emergence of self-government.

Humanism and non-violent action

This socialist vision and the transition path toward it must be imbued with the highest ethical and humanistic values. In this sense, the transition shapes the end - the values that guide the movement will be those that guide the new society. 

The movement leading the transition and new society must be deeply democratic, as well as broadly collaborative and inclusive. It must place the actual physical, intellectual, and spiritual needs of people and nature above all else.

Throughout the 20th century until today, vast change has been won through non-violent action, utilizing all forms of protest and the electoral arena. But still some say don't be naïve. They argue the U.S. has the most violent ruling class in history, and that this class won't concede power peacefully. The people will have to defend themselves and violence will become inevitable.

To be sure, ruling class violence is always a possibility. But to say that it is inevitable is wrong. Just as wrong is to insist nothing can be done to limit or prevent it. The Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement met violence not with pacifism, but with greater non-violent action, mobilizing ever-larger numbers of people motivated by a higher moral calling. It exposed the immorality of the segregationists, crumbled their resistance, and brought about a civil rights revolution that, although incomplete, transformed our nation. Let that be our guide.

Crisis of nature, crisis of capitalism

The climate and ecological crisis is a crisis for humanity. It is also a crisis for capitalism and its ability to address the inevitable havoc of actual climate change and and adapt to a fully sustainable model. To save our planet though, humanity can't wait on a global transition to socialism. Profound and radical changes in our economy and society must begin today if the Earth is to avert the worst of the destruction.

Sections of the capitalist class are alarmed over the prospect of major disruptions of the market economy and are pushing for a transition to renewable energy sources. But that transition to a sustainable economy means imposing greater national regulation on the "market system," including of externalities and liquidation of the fossil fuel industry.

Ultimately it means transferring all natural resources and the energy production sector to public ownership managed under democratic authority. It means a radical reallocation of social expenditures needed to rebuild the nation's infrastructure from coast to coast, retrofitting for conservation, and converting to renewables.

It means a guaranteed wage and retraining for new jobs for all those who are displaced during a just transition or whose jobs have been eliminated due to automation (although here more far reaching reforms are needed like a shorter work week with no cut in pay). It means allocating necessary resources to adapt to the inevitable changes wrought by global warming, including extreme weather events, coastal flooding, relocating entire communities, building massive infrastructure works, overcoming drought, and deforestation.

The immense resources needed can only come through a redistribution of society's wealth, which will require a conscious and determined struggle against the capitalist class. The battle will be over who pays for it: the ruling circles or the working class and people?

A similar redistribution struggle will be fought to ensure a $15/hour minimum wage or a living wage, universal health care, and free college tuition.

This will be part of the process of developing mechanisms for directing social investment and imposing further restrictions on capital and the anarchy of the market economy. This implies the need to raise Earth consciousness and intertwine it with class, racial, and gender consciousness.

To again quote Marx, socialism is "the real movement that abolishes the present state of things."  Building the movements of today, including defeating the danger of right-wing extremism in the 2016 elections, is a revolutionary act and a crucial part of the actual long-term realization of a uniquely American, modern, people-centered, democratic, peaceful, and green socialism.

John Bachtell is the National Chair of the Communist Party. Previously he was Illinois organizer for the party, and is active in labor, peace, and justice struggles. He grew up in Ohio and currently lives in Chicago.


 -- via my feedly newsfeed

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Health Class [feedly]

----
Health Class
// Working-Class Perspectives

Late last year, economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton published a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science documenting the rising morbidity and mortality in mid-life white men and women in America, especially for those with a high school degree or less.  They attributed this increase, a reversal of historic trends, to an epidemic of alcoholism, other drug use disorders, and suicide. Their findings are a wake up call for the US. Not only is something seriously wrong — it's getting worse.

As a community psychiatrist (that is, one who works in the community providing publicly funded care) in Pittsburgh, I was not at all shocked to read the paper and the several others that followed and found essentially the same thing.  Working both in inner city black Pittsburgh and the more racially mixed Mon Valley, the primary site of Pittsburgh's once vaunted steel mills, I have seen twenty years of increasing psychiatric burden and disability with what seemed to be a marked increase in mortality — all linked to increasingly fragmented, chaotic families, extraordinary work instability, trauma, violence, and alcohol and substance use.  While human services and health care were clearly in the picture in the lives of many (health care increasingly so with the Affordable Care Act), other critical institutions — steady work, solid education, high qualify day care, stable housing, organized communities – seemed to be less present, casualties of deindustrialization and neighborhood decline.  With the economic collapse of 2008 and the rise of the opiate epidemic, conditions have felt like they are in free fall, with tattered individuals and the remnants of families struggling to hang on.

My day-to-day job is to do what I can to help people find ways to overcome their distress and rediscover their capacities and capabilities to find a way forward. Of course, I don't do this alone. It requires a team effort to help suffering people recover and manage their illnesses and organize the resources they need to put a life together.  We have some resources to do this, such as the ACA's expansion of Medicaid in Pennsylvania.  But still the observation of Julian Tudor Hart, a renowned British physician working among the miners in Wales, rings true: the people with the greatest need generally have the least access to resources. Hart called this the "Inverse Care Law."

For a long time and to this day, this has been the American approach to health care, though the ACA does a bit to address it.  Given this, some Americans may assume that the recent increase in mortality among white folks reflects a lack of access to needed care.

The work of two other Brits, Thomas McKeown and Michael Marmot reveals the inadequacy of this belief.  McKeown made the trenchant observation that it wasn't health care that made people healthy, but rather the conditions in which they lived. Marmot pressed this observation and, in a series of famous studies of civil servants in the British Government, found that health status was tied in a step-wise fashion with class.  Poor working-class people had worse health then their middle-class colleagues who in turn were less healthy than the highly paid executives.  These findings created a fire storm around the world, but some thirty years later, the idea has finally begun to find its way to the US in the form a focus on the "social determinants of health." Where people live, their income, the resources available to them, the web of social relationships they experience, all come under this rubric. Health isn't just about people's lifestyle — whether they smoke or drink — or about their access to health care. It is fundamentally about the kinds of lives people live and how they are socially structured. Health is profoundly ecological– it reflects the social habitat and physical environment people live in.

This new focus permits us to say that what's happening to the health and well-being of poor white folks is clear evidence that the life worlds and social circumstances of their lives are falling apart.  Their social habitat is strained, and the strain is showing up in a looming body count.

We could do more to make it easier for people to access the resources they need beyond health care and by tapping into their capabilities and capacities to find ways to flourish.  Steps in this direction include concepts like the "medical home", an expanded version of accessible team- based primary health care that focuses on people's well-being over the life course, providing preventive and clinical services, promoting health and connecting people to the resources needed for healthy living. In psychiatry, the recognition that people with psychiatric challenges have untapped capacities to recover — to find meaningful ways to live — is reshaping clinical approaches so they connect with and build on those capabilities. These innovations are all good, but they are woefully insufficient given the scale and scope of what the nation faces.

To achieve what we need to achieve, our society needs to move the conversation about health and well-being upstream, away from a focus on health care alone, and link health and health care with general social policy.  The moves towards "the social determinants and processes of health," "health in all policy," "population health," and "health impact assessments," backed by a politics of social inclusion, are the ways forward to achieve health and social equity.

The country we create determines the patterns of life and death of the people who live here. It's not a job just for doctors and other health care providers. We are all stewards of the health of the people of this country. Increasing numbers of people won't thrive and will die young until we fully embrace this responsibility.

Kenneth Thompson

Kenneth S. Thompson MD is a public service community psychiatrist in Pittsburgh whose career has been focused on improving psychiatric care and achieving health equity.

----

Shared via my feedly newsfeed

Monday, June 13, 2016

John Oliver on Retirement Plans [feedly]

----
John Oliver on Retirement Plans
// The Big Picture

Saving for retirement means navigating a potential minefield of high fees and bad advice. Billy Eichner and Kristin Chenoweth share some tips.

 

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Retirement Plans (HBO)

The post John Oliver on Retirement Plans appeared first on The Big Picture.

----

Shared via my feedly newsfeed

Microsoft, Reasserting Its Muscle, Buys LinkedIn for $26.2 Billion [feedly]

----
Microsoft, Reasserting Its Muscle, Buys LinkedIn for $26.2 Billion
// NYT > Business

The companies said that Microsoft would pay $196 a share to acquire LinkedIn, the business social network site.
----

Shared via my feedly newsfeed

Catching up on some old stuff [feedly]

----
Catching up on some old stuff
// Jared Bernstein | On the Economy

Given the horrific mass-shooting in Orlando over the weekend, it seems irreverent and off-point to scribble about the usual grist for the mill. So a bit of catchup and forward-looking stuff.

–I'll have a great interview in tomorrow's WaPo with CBPPs Elizabeth McNichol on the need for infrastructure investment, with an emphasis on the state and local dimensions. Read her recent paper for background.

–The Fed meets this week to probably/hopefully not move on interest rates. I've got another piece coming out later this week arguing that this is a good thing. Given very low interest rates across the globe and volatile capital flows, even a small tap on the breaks could slow the economy a lot more than planned, drawing in capital, strengthening the dollar, and exacerbating the trade deficit, with no room to offset the drag through monetary or fiscal policy (the former's constrained by the near-zero-lower-bound, the latter by dysfunctional politics).

–I testified in the House last week (for almost three hours!) as House Republicans tried to kill the Obama administration's new overtime rule. Here's my spoken testimony and here's the longer, written version. No one will be surprised that the R's want to block the updating of the threshold, which, as the figure below shows, even with the new update, is only partially back to where it was in the mid-1970s. But I was struck by the depth of their negativity, by the extent of their rancor at the new rule. They really can't abide middle-class people catching a break on this one and are deeply frustrated that they may not be able to stop it, much like the ACA.

–I took off from a WSJ piece on student debt to think about the factors that distinguish between good debt and bad debt.

–Riffing on Paul Ryan's nothing-burger of an anti-poverty plan on the Talk Poverty podcast.

I won't veer much out of my lane and get into the Orlando shooting other than to offer a few links and a thought or two.

This piece by Richard Kim really resonated. It includes some curse words, as it should.

–This political analysis from the WaPo seemed about right to me. Above I note how political dysfunction blocks needed fiscal policy. Fine, whatever…we can debate that. But what's so deeply frustrating and scary about this last in a series of these murderous events is that the same dysfunction blocks necessary action against such attacks.

What's that? There's nothing that could have been done to stop this given that the guy was a security guard with legitimate gun licenses? Well, how about this?: if you're someone that the FBI has interviewed twice because of concerns about the danger you might pose to society, and you've recently purchased an assault weapon, a light goes off somewhere and law enforcement looks you up and keeps a very close eye on you.

Again, I don't mean to tread outside my expertise, but I was in the car yesterday listening to about an hour of analysis about the killings and all I heard was endless chatter about whether this was terrorism, hate crime, blah, blah. What does it matter which demons got inside this madman's head? Would it be less of a tragedy if his toaster told him to do it versus his sick, twisted version of religion amped up by homophobia?

I'm not at all saying such analysis is unimportant; as Kim points out, the assault on a gay club is a particularly wrenching aspect of this tragedy. But I am saying that when I hear such an emphasis on motivation and so little on prevention, I'm reminded of the incredible and impenetrable dominance of the gun lobby (see Michael Cohen on this point).

----

Shared via my feedly newsfeed

What Big Data Can Teach Political Scientists [feedly]

----
What Big Data Can Teach Political Scientists
// Global Policy Journal

In the world of research, Big Data seems to be living up to its promise. And the results include a wave of new and inspiring projects.WHAT IS BIG DATA?Big data is not simply research that uses a large...Read more
----

Shared via my feedly newsfeed

From newyorker.com: The Case for Free Money

The Case for Free Money
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/06/20/why-dont-we-have-universal-basic-income