Follow by Email

Monday, December 26, 2016

Re: [socialist-econ] Paul Krugman: The Populism Perplex [feedly]

Krugman as smart as he is is hindered by  2 things-- he is blinded by his clintonphilia. Remember his support for Clinton over Obama in 2008 and his support for Clinton against Bernie?  PK also doesn't get political tactics and strategy. The Clinton Campaign made a number of strategic blunders including running the election as a referendum against Trump instead if as a choice. Also, she didn't campaign on economic issues. She essentially quit campaigning on working class economic issues after the convention. Positions and policy don't make a campaign. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 26, 2016, at 3:08 PM, John Case <> wrote:


Krugman's answer (at least PK is honest): "I don't have a fucking clue".

Paul Krugman: The Populism Perplex
// Economist's View

 What should Democrats do to win the votes of the white working class?:

The Populism Perplex, by Paul Krugman, NY Times: ...what put Donald Trump in striking distance was overwhelming support from whites without college degrees. So what can Democrats do to win back at least some of those voters?

Recently Bernie Sanders offered an answer: Democrats should "go beyond identity politics." What's needed, he said, are candidates who understand that working-class incomes are down, who will "stand up to Wall Street, to the insurance companies, to the drug companies, to the fossil fuel industry."

But is there any reason to believe that this would work? Let me offer some reasons for doubt. ...

Any claim that changed policy positions will win elections assumes that the public will hear about those positions. How is that supposed to happen, when most of the news media simply refuse to cover policy substance? ...

Beyond this, the fact is that Democrats have already been pursuing policies that are much better for the white working class... Yet this has brought no political reward. ...

Now, you might say that health insurance is one thing, but what people want are good jobs. Eastern Kentucky used to be coal country, and Mr. Trump, unlike Mrs. Clinton, promised to bring the coal jobs back. ... But it's a nonsensical promise..., there may be a backlash when the coal and manufacturing jobs don't come back, while health insurance disappears.

But maybe not. Maybe a Trump administration can keep its supporters on board, not by improving their lives, but by feeding their sense of resentment.

For let's be serious here: You can't explain the votes of places like Clay County as a response to disagreements about trade policy. The only way to make sense of what happened is to see the vote as an expression of, well, identity politics — some combination of white resentment at what voters see as favoritism toward nonwhites (even though it isn't) and anger ... at liberal elites whom they imagine look down on them.

To be honest, I don't fully understand this resentment. In particular, I don't know why imagined liberal disdain inspires so much more anger than the very real disdain of conservatives who see the poverty of places like eastern Kentucky as a sign of ... personal and moral inadequacy...

One thing is clear, however: Democrats have to figure out why the white working class just voted overwhelmingly against its own economic interests, not pretend that a bit more populism would solve the problem.


Shared via my feedly newsfeed

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Socialist Economics" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.