Follow by Email

Thursday, November 15, 2018

John Quiggin: Brexit: this is it? [feedly]

Quiggen's summary is pretty clear: The May 'deal', NO DEAL or NO Brexit


Brexit: this is it?
http://crookedtimber.org/2018/11/15/brexit-this-is-it/

Since the Brexit referendum was hailed by many as representative of a new force in global politics, it's of interest even on the far side of the planet, and I've watched the slow-motion train wreck with appalled fascination.

So, as far as I can tell, the Brexit deal Theresa May has come up with is pretty much the super-soft version. About the only immediate change it will produce is a return to blue passports in place of the EU burgundy, which, it appears, were always optional. And, it appears, the new passports will be printed in France.

All that assumes that the deal will go through. In this context, I've been struck by a lot of commentary supporting the deal on the basis that a second referendum isn't feasible due to the timing requirements of the Referendums Act. Am I missing something here? Isn't Parliament supreme? And given that this issue has consumed British politics for the last two years or more, can there really be any significant ambiguity about the possible choices articulated by May today: her deal, no deal or no Brexit?

Feel free to comment on these or any other aspects of the issue.


 -- via my feedly newsfeed

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.