Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:15 PM, John Case <email@example.com> wrote:
Not an ounce of data this. I would call it analysis, if I had the slightest idea what it meant, other than a call to further "strategic" studies and inaction. It shuns economics. It abandons class as a relationship to economics. It shuns the F word. It shuns Marxism, which is OK by me since that ism is no less confused than the half-baked liberal speculation offered in its place. Good liberalism is at least evidence and data based. Lecturing the "white working class" -- IMO, a fraudulent, racist concept from the git -- on their sins is a meaningless and futile tactic. Maybe that's not what Sam is saying. Maybe I need to go back to school to understand.
But until then..
This leads nowhere. AND -- it is NOT serious. Not a moment of self criticism: which every critic on the left, at least, to should include at the outset.
We have to do better
On Dec 2, 2016 1:03 PM, "Samuel Webb" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Dear Friend,--
> Here is a new post of mine (http://samwebb.org/), which. no surprise i highly recommend. It's a bit of a different take on what happened and the challenges ahead. Have a good weekend. Sam
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Socialist Economics" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to email@example.com.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/socialist-economics.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/socialist-economics/CADH2idJsYBT%2BDrx-Va8X_2oq3Zk4DwDLkwfYbXg52PFprznpyw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.