Scabby the Rat, a familiar figure on US picket lines, has taken his show on the road. In the past few years, he's been spotted outside several Australian companies, sometimes accompanied by his pals, Fat Cat and Greedy Pig. Scabby's journey shows that both anti-labor efforts and working-class feistiness are every bit as global as capitalism and labor.
In Australia, as in the US, trade union membership has declined, and unions have become less visible in the workplace and community. The giant inflatable balloons unions sometimes display outside employer premises echo the long tradition of usingtrade union bannersand other imagery tobuild solidarityand assert working-class presence. Where earlier images emphasized the value of unions and images of heroic workers, Scabby and his friends focus on a critique of employers and strike breakers. But like so many of the tools unions rely on in fighting for worker justice, these inflatables have become a target for anti-union efforts.
Scabby had his origins in the US in 1990, when he was commissioned by the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers to draw attention to businesses being picketed and send a message to the business owners. The rats, some as big as 30 feet tall, have since been adopted by a number of unions. Scabby has been joined by the cigar smoking Fat Cat with a bag of money in one paw and a construction worker held by the throat in the other. In the US, employers' efforts to have Scabby deflated have been rejected by the National Labor Relations Board, which ruled that Scabby isprotectedby the First Amendment. More recently some union leaders sought to permanentlydeflateScabby, arguing that he does not represent the unions new 'value proposition'. This call was defeated.
Trade union density in Australia has fallen over the last 25 years, and it now stands at only 14.5%. Unions here have been subjected to harsh legislation that restricts industrial action, legally prohibitssecondary boycottsor solidarity actions, has reduced the avenues available for workers to obtain pay increases, and enables employers to bargain with employees in the absence of a trade union. Recent efforts also aim to limit what unions can say or show. AnAustralian Building and Construction Commissioncode outlines a number of measures to ensure freedom of association in the building industry by barring unions from displaying signs using language such as '100% union', 'union site', 'no ticket no start' and from calling employees who do not join the union 'scab', 'rat' or 'grub'. Workers are also prohibited from putting images or symbols associated with unions on employer supplied equipment, property, or clothing. This includes anything with the union name or the white stars and cross associated with theEureka Stockade flag.These types of severe restrictions undermine unions' ability to make themselves visible and take industrial action, and they have prompted some unions to devise new approaches.
One of these is Scabby the Rat, who made his first Australian appearance in 2016 at the Carlton and United Breweries (CUB) picket line. CUB had not renewed a long standing maintenance contract, leaving 55 workers out of a job because they refused to apply for jobs with the new contractor that would have reduced their wages by 65% and imposed non-union conditions such as individual contracts. The maintenance workers set up a picket line and called the replacement workforce 'scab', 'dog' and 'rat' as they crossed the picket line. Australian Courts have ruled that language like 'scab' is offensive and abusive, and upheld the dismissal of a mine worker who held a sign with the words'No principles SCABS No guts'. Some ten weeks into the CUB dispute, five workers from the replacement workforce applied to the industrial tribunal, the Fair Work Commission, for astop bullyingorder, which including a prohibition against calling the replacement workforce 'scabs'. The Electrical Trades Union sidestepped these prohibitions by unveilingScabby the Ratcomplete with a rat trap in front with a slab of CUB beer as the bait. The unions organised a consumer boycott of CUB beer and demonstration in central Melbourne. After six months, the workers were reinstated on their full pay and conditions.
Scabby's next major appearance was in June 2017 at the Esso UGL dispute at Longford, Victoria. Esso had awarded a maintenance contract for its onshore and offshore gas processing plant to UGL, which in turn outsourced the work to a subsidiary that offered workers 15 to 30% lower wages, reduced annual leave and allowances and gave UGL greater discretion over work schedules. The unions set up a picket outside the plant and inflated Scabby. UGL responded by seeking damages from the unions, claiming that Scabby and the picket signs coerced current and prospective employees not to work and represented anti-competitive behavior that had caused substantial loss to the company. The Federal Courtorderedthe unions to deflate and remove Scabby and not display any signs saying 'Don't be Scabby the Rat'. The Australian Workers Union assistant secretary Liam O'Brien stated that Esso's distress over an inflatable rat would be laughable if it were not for the fact that workers' lives had been turned upside down so a multinational could make more profit. Scabby was replaced with the cigar smoking Fat Cat and Greedy Pig, who were allowed to remain on the picket line because they targeted Esso's corporate greed rather than workers who crossed the picket line. The unions sought to broaden and publicise the dispute by holding a rally outside Esso's corporate headquarters on the Yarra River with Scabby and Fat Cat taking rides in boats on the Yarra. The dispute still continues after over 275 days.
Scabby still continues to appear on picket lines, but his appearances have been limited by Court orders. He appeared at the Oakey North mine in Queensland to support 190 workers who had been locked out by mining company Glencore for more than 200 days. In aheateddispute, Glencore issued disciplinary notices to 26 workers its alleged had breached the company's policy on harassment, bullying, and discrimination on the picket line or Facebook. As part of the resolution process the Construction, Forestry Mining and Energy Union agreed not to use the words 'grub', 'maggot' and 'scab' and todeflateScabby the Rat until the dispute was resolved. In late February 2018, after a seven month lock out, the Fair Work Commission intervened and ordered the suspension of the lockout and picket line for three weeks until a new collective agreement could be voted on in late March.
Scabby has his ownFacebook pagewhere unionists share his global exploits. Scabby and his friends Fat Cat and Greedy have become international figures in labour disputes. With them, unions continue to press the boundaries and assert their visibility, relevance, and power in an environment even as legislation and employers work to silence and hide them. In the face of growinginequalityand lowwage growth, in future unions may be showing more of Fat Cat and Greedy Pig than Scabby the Rat.
Ruth Barton is a lecturer in the School of Management at RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. She is active in the union movement and researches trade unions and industrial regeneration.
Later this month, myself and my director of financial planning, Kris Venne will be in Chicago for the week. Readers of our stuff who want to find out more about how you can become a wealth management client, this is your chance — we will be discussing financial planning, asset allocation, and investing during the… Read More The post RWM: We're Coming to Chicago appeared first on The Big Picture .
My Really? April Snow? morning train reads: • Unanswered Financial Debates (Humble Dollar) • Investors can learn a lesson in portfolio diversification from the collecting career of John Maynard Keynes (Moneybeat) • Today's teens are better than you, and we can prove it (Vox) • Conservative Economists Turning Back to Debt Hysteria (New York Magazine) • How America's Largest Local… Read More The po
More and better measurements, for sure. But I recall a tension between quantum mechanics and relativity theory, or results, wherein, if 'you look too close' -- the "measurer" or "observer" becomes an active agent affecting the character and attributes of phenomenon observed.
There are several widely used indexes of well-being. They are given more weight and credibility in EU social-democracies than here. But, from a scientific point of view, the weighting factors uses by each are, to varying degrees, subjective. Life expectancy is a hard number. But the degree to which, for example, health care spending improves quality of life can vary significantly from country to country, or region to region, being co-dependent on other life-style and environmental factors.
As long as, and to the extent, commodities, their production and circulation, are the means of life for billions -- there will be a powerful material force measuring all value in terms of economic wealth
Readers know I've long been noodling over measurement issues, whether it's accurately measuring the economy's capacity–and admitting we don't have reliable, policy relevant gauges of potential GDP or a "natural rate" of unemployment–or maybe most importantly, measuring well-being versus growth. Seethisin today's WaPo.
Like David Pilling, whose book The Growth Delusion I highly recommend in this space, the idea is not to toss GDP growth rates and other aggregate measures. It's to put them in perspective, and critically: be aware of what they leave out. In that regard, I think one of the most important points in the WaPo piece is the need to net out environmental degradation (which, as I point out, includes adding back in some positive developments, like less use of coal, more use of renewables).
The WaPo piece barely scratches the surface of this conversation, of course. The punchline–it takes a village of metrics to begin to characterize the well-being of a populace–invokes the need to evaluate many more metrics, including:
–Are people meeting their basic needs (housing, food, child and health care, etc.); do their incomes come close to what's needed given the cost of living where they live? Such data exist.
–How can we best net out environmental degradation and any progress we've made against it?
–How valid/useful are existing well-being measures, like the Happiness Index in the WaPo piece, the Genuine ProgressIndicator, Bhutan's Gross National Happiness, etc.?
All fodder for future work in this space. Perhaps we can tap this disconnected moment (between growth and well-being) and elevate the need to get away from the usual GDP/stock market etc. and take these measurement challenges much more seriously.
One other point which have space to get into in the piece. This disconnect has obvious political implications. Here's a figure showing the gap between Trump's approval and the unemployment rate–he's uniquely far from the best-fit line. True, LBJ was too, but that was Vietnam (though Trump/war anxiety looms very large for many of us, I'm sure).
Source: Nat Cohn, NYT
Sometimes it's a lot more than the economy, stupid.